Lead Author:

Myeong Lee, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor (Portfolio; E-mail)
Director, Community Informatics Lab (CIL)
Department of Information Sciences & Technology
School of Computing
George Mason University

Myeong Lee, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor (Portfolio; E-mail)
Director, Community Informatics Lab (CIL)
Department of Information Sciences & Technology
School of Computing
George Mason University

Nabit Bajwa, PhD, Computer Science, George Mason University

Sanmay Das, Professor of Computer Science, Virginia Tech

Seth Hunter, Associate Professor, Education Leadership and Policy, George Mason University
George Mason University’s AI Expo
April 29, 2026
Fuse at Mason Square
AI Day was a one-day conference that aimed to address questions that span technical innovation and societal consequence: How do we build AI literacy across disciplines? What does responsible governance look like at an institutional scale? How do we prepare workers for technologies still taking shape?
AI Day featured keynote addresses, research showcases from across the university, panel discussions on innovations in teaching and workforce readiness, and hands-on workshops.
Opening Remarks
President Gregory Washington
According to George Mason University President Gregory Washington, AI is not on the horizon—it’s already here, and the institutions that move decisively will define the future. Drawing parallels to the arrival of the internet and post-WWII research expansion, President Washington challenges universities to treat artificial intelligence not as a tool, but as a transformational force reshaping classrooms, research, operations, workforce preparation, and more.
Welcome Remarks
Amarda Shehu — VP and Chief AI Officer, George Mason University
Vice President and Chief AI Officer Amarda Shehu welcomes the audience of researchers, educators, students, policymakers, and institutional leaders and shares the agenda for the day: to showcase the many ways AI is advancing foundational technologies, responsible classroom practice, scholarship, and governance. She makes particular note of the importance of collaboration across K–12, higher education, and public policy.
Why We’re Here: The Case for AI Convergence
Amarda Shehu
Why is George Mason AI Day important? Amarda Shehu reflects on the day as being not just an event but part of a larger institutional response from the university. In a region where data centers are visible from the highway and federal AI policy is still being written, Northern Virginia is an epicenter for the impact AI is already having on education, workforce, and institutions. However, both George Mason and other public universities face a central tension: the pace of AI change versus the necessarily thoughtful, regulatory pace of curriculum revision, which Shehu explains needs urgent, coordinated action.
Morning Keynote: AI, Society and the Hard Questions
Tina Eliassi-Rad — Northeastern University
A leading voice in AI ethics and network science—and one of the 100 Brilliant Women in AI Ethics (2021)—Tina Eliassi-Rad of Northeastern University examines how AI is reshaping knowledge creation, decision-making, and the future of work, while also raising questions about trust, accountability, and responsible deployment. A rigorous and thought-provoking talk for researchers, educators, and policymakers alike.
What Does AI Literacy Actually Mean?
Pat Yongpradit — General Manager, Global Education and Workforce Policy, Microsoft
Former chief academic officer of Code.org and current Microsoft leader Pat Yongpradit brings a practitioner’s perspective to one of the day’s central questions: What does real AI literacy look like, and what should we actually be teaching students? Drawing on his background as a middle school teacher, his work scaling computer science education nationally, and his current role at Microsoft to challenge educators and institutions to think beyond tool use, Yongpradit talks the audience toward a genuine understanding of how AI works, where it fails, and how broad, inclusive preparation is necessary for learners to thrive.
Building AI Literacy from K–12 to Higher Ed
AI literacy is no longer optional—it’s as foundational as reading, writing, and critical thinking. This panel explores what it means to prepare students as producers of knowledge in an AI-shaped world, not just consumers of it. Highlights include the story behind Virginia’s first high school data science standards of learning, now active in 132 schools statewide, and broader conversation about teaching students at every level the importance of combining technical awareness with human judgment, ethics, creativity, and critical analysis.
Research Showcase: AI at Work Across George Mason University
What does AI research actually look like when serious people are doing it at a public research university? George Mason faculty and researchers answer that question in this TED-style showcase spanning disciplines and applications: computer vision for bruise detection in forensic medical exams, geospatial AI, AI in financial reporting, machine learning for precision health, human-robot interaction, and more. A compelling window into the breadth of AI innovation underway at George Mason University.
Northern Virginia’s AI Infrastructure and What It Means for the Region
Without physical infrastructure, there is no AI—and some of the most critical infrastructure in the world is less than 30 miles from George Mason University. This panel pulls back the curtain on the data centers, power systems, cooling technology, and energy demands that make modern AI possible, featuring experts from Digital Realty (the world’s largest global data center platform), NVIDIA, and George Mason’s own Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. The conversation closes with a call for university-industry-government partnership to responsibly power the AI future in our own backyard.
Convergence: What Virginia’s AI Moment Requires
What will it take for Virginia to realize its AI potential? Convergence: the coming together of disciplines, sectors, and perspectives to fully coordinate across the education and policy pipeline. Panelists representing K–12, community college, higher education, law, and the Virginia House of Delegates discuss the current gaps and brainstorm solutions, emphasizing interdisciplinary thinking and coordinated leadership as essential to building responsible and effective AI ecosystems.
Navigating AI Uncertainty
For higher education CIOs, AI decisions have quickly evolved from technology questions to institution-defining ones—with consequences for enrollment, student success, academic integrity, financial stability, and public confidence. Moderated by George Mason University CIO Charmaine Madison, this panel convenes CIOs from Virginia Tech, University of Maryland Baltimore, Northern Virginia Community College, and Arlington Public Schools for a frank conversation about navigating risk, building trust, and making high-stakes AI decisions under uncertainty.
Working With AI: Faculty Demonstrations of AI in the Classroom
Get a close-up look at integrating AI into teaching and scholarship. Four faculty members each take 10 minutes to demonstrate real applications of AI in practice, including redesigning a health informatics course for nursing students using AI-driven, clinically contextualized instruction; building AI agents with custom instructions to prevent hallucination and drift; and more. Practical, specific, and immediately applicable for educators exploring AI-enhanced pedagogy.
A Conversation with U.S. Representative Don Beyer
U.S. Representative Don Beyer
U.S. Representative Don Beyer of Virginia’s 8th District joins Amarda Shehu for a wide-ranging chat on AI, governance, and what this technological moment could mean for humanity. A fifth-generation Northern Virginian who has been taking computer science and math classes at George Mason for four years, Beyer brings both legislative perspective and genuine intellectual curiosity to questions about AI safety, the future of work, fusion energy, and what he calls—carefully but optimistically—the potential for a “Renaissance cubed.”
George Mason University is leading the future of inclusive AI—and AI Day is just the beginning.
As the largest and most diverse university in Virginia, George Mason combines fearless ideas with responsible frameworks to advance AI research, education, workforce development, and community engagement. Through initiatives like AI2Nexus and PatriotAI, and with faculty working across every college, George Mason is building the people, partnerships, and infrastructure to ensure that as AI reshapes the world, it does so equitably and with everyone at the table.
Powering Artificial Intelligence »

Nabit Bajwa, Doctoral Candidate, Computer Science, George Mason University

Sanmay Das, Professor of Computer Science, Virginia Tech

Seth Hunter, Associate Professor, Education Leadership and Policy, George Mason University
As artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot become fixtures in K-12 classrooms, school and district leaders face a new and largely invisible policy question: what is the environmental cost of student AI use, and what can districts do about it? This interactive calculator, developed by Dr. Seth B. Hunter at EdPolicyForward: The Center for Education Policy at George Mason University, is designed for education policymakers, district administrators, curriculum directors, and sustainability officers who want to move beyond awareness and into action.

With just a few clicks, users can configure the tool to reflect their own district’s enrollment, AI adoption rate, and model complexity, along with the electricity grid serving their AI vendor’s data centers. They can then explore how much additional energy and carbon emissions student AI use adds on top of existing digital infrastructure.
The tool’s central finding is that model selection matters more than usage volume. A standard chatbot query now uses roughly the energy of a web search, while a reasoning or “thinking mode” query can use more than a hundred times as much. That makes model right-sizing the highest-leverage clause a district can write into an AI vendor contract.
The tool also projects emissions trajectories through 2031 under business-as-usual versus policy-intervention scenarios, drawing on federal data, peer-reviewed research, and the environmental disclosures AI providers have published. Potential uses include briefing school boards on AI’s environmental footprint, informing AI procurement and vendor contract language, supporting district sustainability planning, and anchoring professional development conversations about responsible AI use in schools.
Estimates are order-of-magnitude rather than an emissions inventory. The tool documents its sources, assumptions, and limitations in full, including what it does not count: model training, hardware manufacturing, and water use.
Version 2.0. Data current as of September 2026. Per-query AI energy estimates are changing quickly, so check the version date before citing any figure.
Try the tool here – https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/4a76bfbf-5f29-4d90-ab06-6c8a27bcaacb.
A NOTE ON VERSION 2
The link above points to version 2 of this tool, which produces different results than version 1. The change reflects genuine advances in how AI energy use is measured and managed rather than a correction to the earlier arithmetic.
Three developments drove the revision. First, AI providers began publishing production measurements of per-query energy for the first time in 2025, and those measurements came in well below earlier published estimates. Google reported that the energy behind a median text prompt fell by a factor of 33 over a single year, the result of more efficient hardware, better models, and improved data center operations. Version 2 estimates a standard chatbot query at roughly one-sixth the energy version 1 assumed.
Second, the picture is not uniformly improving. Reasoning models, which work through problems step by step, use far more energy per query than standard models. Version 2 treats these as a separate category and estimates them substantially higher than version 1 did. The net effect on any given district depends on which models its students actually use, which is why model selection is now the tool’s central theme.
Third, the underlying reference data was refreshed: current EPA grid emission rates, current federal enrollment counts, and 2026 survey data on student AI adoption, which has roughly doubled since the figures version 1 relied on.
Users who ran version 1 should re-run their district in version 2 rather than assuming earlier results still hold. Version 2 documents every constant, its source, and its vintage, so any result can be traced or reproduced.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has released its official Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy Framework, a landmark resource designed to help workers, educators, employers, and workforce agencies prepare for an AI-driven economy. Issued in February 2026 through Training and Employment Notice No. 07-25, this framework provides a common foundation for building AI skills across the American workforce — from classrooms to shop floors to offices.
What Is AI Literacy?
The DOL defines AI literacy as a foundational set of competencies that enable individuals to use and evaluate AI technologies responsibly. The framework places particular emphasis on generative AI — tools like chatbots and content generators — which are increasingly central to the modern workplace. AI literacy is not about becoming a programmer or data scientist. It is about every worker having the baseline knowledge to confidently and responsibly work alongside AI tools.
Who Is This Framework For?
The framework is designed for a wide range of audiences:
The 5 Foundational Content Areas
The framework identifies five core knowledge areas every AI-literate worker should develop:
1. Understand AI Principles Workers need a basic understanding of how AI systems work — including how they generate outputs, their limitations (such as “hallucinations” or incorrect responses), and the importance of human oversight. This is about building vocabulary and mental models, not technical expertise.
2. Explore AI Uses Workers should be exposed to real-world applications of AI across industries — from drafting documents and summarizing reports to decision-support tools and creative assistance. Familiarity builds confidence and judgment.
3. Direct AI Effectively Effective AI use requires knowing how to write clear prompts, provide context, supply relevant information, and iterate on outputs. This is often called “prompt engineering” and is a practical, learnable skill.
4. Evaluate AI Outputs AI does not always get it right. Workers must be able to verify accuracy, spot logical errors, assess completeness, and apply their own expertise and judgment before acting on AI-generated content.
5. Use AI Responsibly Workers need to understand how to protect sensitive data, follow workplace policies, avoid misuse, and maintain accountability for the decisions and outputs they produce with AI tools.
The 7 Delivery Principles
The DOL does not just tell us what to teach — it also offers guidance on how to teach it effectively:
Why This Matters for Education
This framework is directly relevant to schools, colleges, and training programs. It complements the U.S. Department of Education’s own guidance on AI, and builds on Executive Order 14277 on advancing AI education for American youth. For educators, it offers a clear, flexible structure for integrating AI literacy into existing curricula — not as a standalone subject, but woven into the learning experiences students already have.
The message is clear: AI literacy is no longer optional. Whether a student is heading into healthcare, manufacturing, business, or the trades, foundational AI skills will be essential to their success.
Read the Full Framework
You can access the complete DOL AI Literacy Framework here: 👉 U.S. Department of Labor AI Literacy Framework (PDF)

Artificial intelligence dominated conversations across the globe, from copyright lawsuits against AI art generators to developing legislation for artificial intelligence regulation. As we enter this new frontier of technological advancement and intelligence, George Mason is positioning itself to be a pioneer in the field.
On this episode of Access to Excellence, President Gregory Washington and George Mason’s inaugural vice president and chief AI officer Amarda Shehu discuss the research possibilities of AI and the role of higher education in AI training and development.

In today’s rapidly evolving world, the skills required for success are constantly shifting. The 21st century demands a new set of durable skills — critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity, grit, and curiosity. Padhu Seshaiyer, Professor and Director at George Mason University, discusses the challenges of teaching in the 21st century and the ways he is responding to this challenge in his work with educators.
What does it really mean to make evidence-based decisions in education? In this episode, First State Education’s Executive Director Dr. Julia Keller sits down with Dr. Seth Hunter, Associate Professor at George Mason University and nationally recognized researcher in education policy and leadership. Drawing on his experience across classrooms, state agencies, and research institutions, Dr. Hunter discusses the challenges school boards face in using data well, the power and risk of story-driven decision-making, and how thoughtful use of evidence, pilots, and emerging technologies like AI can support better outcomes for students.

Elizabeth Davis, Postdoctoral Researcher, Education Policy, George Mason University

Alyssa Barone, Graduate Research Assistant, Education Policy, George Mason University